As discussed in Part I there are many astute property and share investors in Australia who often fail to ensure that the investment loan they take offers the best available features and most tax efficient investment loan structure for them.When considering an investment loan you should ensure that you maximise your investment loan and that the interest rate is competitive (but not necessarily the cheapest – do not sacrifice features for interest rate); you should take the investment loan on an interest only basis and apply any surplus cash you have to the repayment of your non-deductible (your negative gearing benefits are maintained); you should not mix your investment loan with your home loan debt because the Australian Tax Office requires that any additional repayments of principal to such a “mixed” account must be apportioned between the home loan and the investment loan (your negative gearing benefits on your investment loan will reduce as a result).Another feature that all investors should include in their investment loan is a separate capitalising investment line of credit. The line of credit should be for a 10 year term minimum and be interest only. The importance of a capitalising line of credit within your investment loan structure cannot be underestimated. By having such a facility including in the investment loan you protect yourself form unforeseen vacancies and expenses in relation to the upkeep of your investment property. In a recent private ruling issued by the ATO a taxpayer was provided with a favourable outcome when he sought confirmation from the ATO that where he held an investment loan and the rental income did not cover his investment expenses (interest, costs, rates etc) then he could capitalise interest on an investment line of credit where the line of credit was used to meet the shortfall between his investment income and his investment costs (interest on the investment loan being a large portion of this. The taxpayer also had a home loan and advised the ATO in his private ruling application that he did not want to use his personal income to subsidise the shortfall (including the interest on his investment loan) that he was having to meet each month. Rather he sought to draw down on the line of credit within his investment loan facility to meet the shortfall and apply as much of his personal income to the repayment of his personal home loan debt.Under the line of credit he was not required to make any payments to the investment line of credit so the debt increased. The interest also increased with the result that the taxpayer could deduct the simple interest on the investment loan as well as the simple and capitalised interest on the investment line of credit. This delivered additional negative gearing benefits to the taxpayer while also saving him significant dollars on his home loan debt. By applying more of his personal income to repay personal debt he reduced his home loan term by 8 years and saved himself many thousands of dollars in the process.Make sure you include a capitalising line of credit within your investment loan structure – you have both protection (from vacancies, higher interest rates,unexpected costs) as well as the opportunity to increase your negative gearing benefits and reduce your home loan interest! Make your investment loan work for you and improve your investment return.
Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ category
What the Best Investment Loan Should Offer You Part 2
October 23rd, 2009As discussed in Part I there are many astute property and share investors in Australia who often fail to ensure that the investment loan they take offers the best available features and most tax efficient investment loan structure for them.When considering an investment loan you should ensure that you maximise your investment loan and that the interest rate is competitive (but not necessarily the cheapest – do not sacrifice features for interest rate); you should take the investment loan on an interest only basis and apply any surplus cash you have to the repayment of your non-deductible (your negative gearing benefits are maintained); you should not mix your investment loan with your home loan debt because the Australian Tax Office requires that any additional repayments of principal to such a “mixed” account must be apportioned between the home loan and the investment loan (your negative gearing benefits on your investment loan will reduce as a result).Another feature that all investors should include in their investment loan is a separate capitalising investment line of credit. The line of credit should be for a 10 year term minimum and be interest only. The importance of a capitalising line of credit within your investment loan structure cannot be underestimated. By having such a facility including in the investment loan you protect yourself form unforeseen vacancies and expenses in relation to the upkeep of your investment property. In a recent private ruling issued by the ATO a taxpayer was provided with a favourable outcome when he sought confirmation from the ATO that where he held an investment loan and the rental income did not cover his investment expenses (interest, costs, rates etc) then he could capitalise interest on an investment line of credit where the line of credit was used to meet the shortfall between his investment income and his investment costs (interest on the investment loan being a large portion of this. The taxpayer also had a home loan and advised the ATO in his private ruling application that he did not want to use his personal income to subsidise the shortfall (including the interest on his investment loan) that he was having to meet each month. Rather he sought to draw down on the line of credit within his investment loan facility to meet the shortfall and apply as much of his personal income to the repayment of his personal home loan debt.Under the line of credit he was not required to make any payments to the investment line of credit so the debt increased. The interest also increased with the result that the taxpayer could deduct the simple interest on the investment loan as well as the simple and capitalised interest on the investment line of credit. This delivered additional negative gearing benefits to the taxpayer while also saving him significant dollars on his home loan debt. By applying more of his personal income to repay personal debt he reduced his home loan term by 8 years and saved himself many thousands of dollars in the process.Make sure you include a capitalising line of credit within your investment loan structure – you have both protection (from vacancies, higher interest rates,unexpected costs) as well as the opportunity to increase your negative gearing benefits and reduce your home loan interest! Make your investment loan work for you and improve your investment return.
My Little Nest Egg – an Investment Loan Helps Me Secure My Investment Property in Australia
September 15th, 2009I recently decided the time was right to utilize some surplus cash I had available and began looking to purchase an investment property. Whilst it would have been easy to just dive in and find something that I could afford regardless of the location or potential growth, I thought it best to do some research knowing that my investment property was more than likely going to be a long term property investment for me. Timing was also good from an income perspective –I good easily demonstrate my capacity to service the investment loan I would need to complete the purchase and negatively gear the property. The “cost” of my investment loan after tax benefits were taken into account was considerably reduced.
When I began to think carefully about purchasing my investment property, I took such things as what economists were predicting as far as growth and property value increases as well as expenses that I would incur, both now and ongoing. This was definitely a decision I had to make with my head and not my heart. I also considered what was happening in the investment loan scene particularly in relation to features of an investment loan that could be advantageous for me as well as the general interest rate environment.
On the property front, my first port of call was to view the recent BIS Shrapnel report noting that by mid-2011, the median Sydney house price will climb from $560,000 to $650,000 – A senior economist at the firm, Jason Anderson, said the price rise would be spread across the city, helping cut the gap between Sydney’s two-speed property market. This was quite encouraging and meant that I could now look at a vast array of locations for my investment property. Whilst deciding on a local property, I also looked at the opportunity to perhaps purchase an investment property interstate, which is definitely something prospective buyers should focus on.
As far as investment loan product was concerned I checked out a number of mortgages until I found one that included a capitalizing interest component. I wanted to make sure that in the event that I had surplus personal income I could apply as much as possible of this to my home loan repayment as opposed to subsidizing my investment loan repayments. A capitalizing feature in an investment loan also gives me some protection in case of unexpected maintenance costs on my investment or a prolonged vacancy.
The next important issue I had to consider when deciding on an investment property was the cost associated with the purchase. There were the up-front costs such as loan fees, legal fees and government charges as well as the ongoing costs such as maintenance costs, real estate agent’s fees (rent collection), loan repayments, government taxes, etc. From a discussion I then had with my accountant, I discovered that as this was to be an investment property, most of the costs associated with the purchase, both up-front and ongoing, were tax deductible, either in the year I incurred them or in some cases they had to be spread out or amortized over a 3 or 5 year term.
I also checked out the possibility of borrowing these costs within my investment loan. This is always a possibility but I discovered that if your investment loan exceeds 80% of the purchase price then the costs increase – basically it did not seem worthwhile to take my investment loan past 80%. I did realize however that if I included my home property as security for the investment loan (I had quite good equity in my home) then this meant that I could borrow 100% + costs on the purchase within the investment loan. This again meant that instead of applying my savings to the investment purchase (and taking a smaller investment loan) I applied this to the reduction of my non-deductible home loan debt and increased my investment loan debt. Increasing the investment loan like this was much more tax efficient for me.
Having done my own property research and having sourced an excellent investment loan I now felt at ease with my decision to go ahead and start to look in earnest for a property.
I am now the proud owner of an affordable investment property that I negatively gear for taxation purposes through my investment loan. With the help of a reputable non-bank home loan provider, I have structured my home and investment loans to maximize my tax benefits.
When thinking about purchasing an investment property and looking for an investment loan it would always be advisable to thoroughly research the current real estate market, source qualified information about where the market is heading both locally and interstate as sometimes this may be a more profitable option and finally, speak to qualified financial consultants as this could potentially save you thousands when claiming deductible expenses. And don’t forget to make sure your home and investment loan are structured properly so that you are minimizing your tax bill as much as possible.

